These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test? Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample. Goodie AS; Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 10220928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009). Zentall TR; Stagner JP J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When discrimination fails (or at least falters). Urcuioli PJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 17044739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-choice information processing by pigeons. Martin TI; Zentall TR Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-pressure effects on performance in a base-rate task. Goodie AS; Crooks CL J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 14977029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons. Zentall TR; Smith AP Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():26-42. PubMed ID: 26165174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discriminative proprieties of Vary and Repeat contingencies. Souza Ada S; Abreu-Rodrigues J Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 20619326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view. Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Goodie AS; Fantino E Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):247-9. PubMed ID: 8637572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering. Brown GS; White KG J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19364232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not. Trujano RE; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aligning confidence with accuracy: revisiting the role of feedback. González-Vallejo C; Bonham A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 16962061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays. Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The delay-reduction hypothesis: effects of informative events on response rates and choice. Fantino E; Case DA Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 May; 46(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 8316642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]