These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16181446)

  • 1. Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.
    Fantino E; Kanevsky IG; Charlton SR
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):820-5. PubMed ID: 16181446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample.
    Goodie AS; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 10220928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory mechanisms in pigeons: evidence of base-rate neglect.
    Zentall TR; Clement TS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Jan; 28(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11868229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When discrimination fails (or at least falters).
    Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 17044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-choice information processing by pigeons.
    Martin TI; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-pressure effects on performance in a base-rate task.
    Goodie AS; Crooks CL
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 14977029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Smith AP
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():26-42. PubMed ID: 26165174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminative proprieties of Vary and Repeat contingencies.
    Souza Ada S; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 20619326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reversal learning in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia): qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility.
    Rayburn-Reeves RM; Stagner JP; Kirk CR; Zentall TR
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 May; 127(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 22428983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.
    Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error.
    Goodie AS; Fantino E
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):247-9. PubMed ID: 8637572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering.
    Brown GS; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19364232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rats are optimal in a choice task in which pigeons are not.
    Trujano RE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():22-7. PubMed ID: 26200394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aligning confidence with accuracy: revisiting the role of feedback.
    González-Vallejo C; Bonham A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 16962061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
    Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The delay-reduction hypothesis: effects of informative events on response rates and choice.
    Fantino E; Case DA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 May; 46(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 8316642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rotational object discrimination by pigeons.
    Koban A; Cook R
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):250-65. PubMed ID: 19364233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavior-analytic approaches to decision making.
    Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 15157977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.