These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16181474)

  • 1. Is your patch test really necessary?
    Dupont C
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Oct; 153(4):842. PubMed ID: 16181474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact dermatitis and workforce economics.
    Jacob SE; Steele T
    Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2006 Jun; 25(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 16908402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Positive patch test reaction without clinical contact dermatitis--what is the best approach in medico-legal evaluation?].
    Fartasch M; Drexler H; Diepgen TL; John SM; Brandenburg S
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Jan; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 18190432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Prick test and patch test].
    Shono M
    Arerugi; 2008 Feb; 57(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18349584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized patch test data collection and analysis.
    Rosenthal LE
    Semin Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 8(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 2641714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Pitfalls of the patch tests].
    Hannuksela M
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(17):1845-9; quiz 1850, 1866. PubMed ID: 12001639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years.
    Patel S; Basketter DA; Jefferies D; White IR; Rycroft RJ; McFadden JP; Ho SY
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jan; 56(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 17177707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Characteristics of patients with hand dermatitis referred to the contact dermatitis unit of a tertiary hospital and impact of patch testing on diagnosis].
    Carrascosa JM; Benvenuti F; Rodríguez C; Ferrándiz C
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2009; 100(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 19709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high-positive patch test load correlates with further positive patch test reactions irrespective of their location.
    Brasch J; Geier J; Schnuch A; Uter W; ;
    Allergy; 2006 Dec; 61(12):1411-5. PubMed ID: 17073870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sanitary napkin contact dermatitis of the vulva: location-dependent differences in skin surface conditions may play a role in negative patch test results.
    Wakashin K
    J Dermatol; 2007 Dec; 34(12):834-7. PubMed ID: 18078410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there an in vitro test for type IV allergy discriminating between sensitization and allergic disease?
    Traidl-Hoffmann C; Ring J
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2008 Sep; 38(9):1412-5. PubMed ID: 18644023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch tests.
    MORRIS GE
    Ind Med Surg; 1953 Jan; 22(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 13022117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Some thoughts on the technique of epicutaneous tests (author's transl)].
    Novák M
    Cesk Dermatol; 1981 Aug; 56(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 7273160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Item no 114: cutaneous-mucous allergies in children and adults: contact dermatitis].
    CEDEF
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Nov; 135(11 Suppl):F88-94. PubMed ID: 18984235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Histological examination in patch tests].
    PRAKKEN JR; VAN VLOTEN J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1952 Feb; 96(6):354-5. PubMed ID: 14919804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Airborne contact dermatitis due to Japanese cedar pollen.
    Yokozeki H; Satoh T; Katayama I; Nishioka K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Apr; 56(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 17343624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Buchholz HJ; Belsito DV; Maibach HI; Fowler JF; Rietschel RL; Zug KA; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Deleo VA; Marks JG
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Jan; 60(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 18992965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A confidence interval for the reaction index.
    Kuss O; Dickel H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Apr; 62(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 20433449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misleading patch tests; report of two cases.
    EPSTEIN S; PINKUS H
    AMA Arch Derm; 1957 Feb; 75(2):260-1. PubMed ID: 13393797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch tests: will they die a bureaucratic death?
    Elgart ML
    Ann Allergy; 1991 Dec; 67(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 1750715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.