265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16182978)
21. The effect of triage-applied Ottawa Ankle Rules on the length of stay in a Canadian urgent care department: a randomized controlled trial.
Fan J; Woolfrey K
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 13(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 16436790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle Rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department.
MacLellan J; Smith T; Baserman J; Dowling S
CJEM; 2018 Sep; 20(5):746-752. PubMed ID: 28965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does nurse-led initiation of Ottawa ankle rules reduce ED length of stay?
Curr S; Xyrichis A
Int Emerg Nurs; 2015 Oct; 23(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 25779054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Australia.
Broomhead A; Stuart P
Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Apr; 15(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 12675622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of Triage Nurse Initiated Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules on Emergency Department Length of Stay at a Tertiary Centre.
Lee WW; Filiatrault L; Abu-Laban RB; Rashidi A; Yau L; Liu N
CJEM; 2016 Mar; 18(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 26189587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative analysis of ENP's and SHO's in the application of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Hopkins M
Int Emerg Nurs; 2010 Oct; 18(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 20869659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED.
Markert RJ; Walley ME; Guttman TG; Mehta R
Am J Emerg Med; 1998 Oct; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 9786538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rule to exclude fractures in acute ankle injuries in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gomes YE; Chau M; Banwell HA; Causby RS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Sep; 23(1):885. PubMed ID: 36151550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules by general practitioners in the emergency department of a Turkish district hospital.
Daş M; Temiz A; Çevik Y
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2016 Jul; 22(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 27598609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Decision rules for roentgenography of children with acute ankle injuries.
Chande VT
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Mar; 149(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 7858683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A case-control study of the transit times through an accident and emergency department of ankle injured patients assessed using the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Allerston J; Justham D
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2000 Jul; 8(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 10893558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Safety and efficiency of the Ottawa Ankle Rule in a Swiss population with ankle sprains.
Can U; Ruckert R; Held U; Buchmann P; Platz A; Bachmann LM
Swiss Med Wkly; 2008 May; 138(19-20):292-6. PubMed ID: 18491243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 44-55-66-PM, a mnemonic that improves retention of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules: a randomized controlled trial.
Gravel J; Roy M; Carrière B
Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 17(8):859-64. PubMed ID: 20670323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record.
Salazar L; Best TM; Hiestand B
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 29(9):999-1002. PubMed ID: 20674227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of the Ottawa Knee Rule vs the Pittsburgh Decision Rule.
Cheung TC; Tank Y; Breederveld RS; Tuinebreijer WE; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Derksen RJ
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 31(4):641-5. PubMed ID: 23399332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study.
Boutis K; Komar L; Jaramillo D; Babyn P; Alman B; Snyder B; Mandl KD; Schuh S
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2118-21. PubMed ID: 11784626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Fewer x-rays while maintaining quality of clinical care using clinical protocols for physical diagnosis of ankle injuries].
van Riet YE; van der Schouw YT; van der Werken C
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 10682650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study (the SOFAR study).
Canagasabey MD; Callaghan MJ; Carley S
Emerg Med J; 2011 Oct; 28(10):838-40. PubMed ID: 20943841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
