179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16183106)
1. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues.
Malpica A; Matisic JP; Niekirk DV; Crum CP; Staerkel GA; Yamal JM; Guillaud MH; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin NM; Macaulay CA; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S38-52. PubMed ID: 16183106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.
Gage JC; Joste N; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2542-8. PubMed ID: 24075599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical biopsy specimens obtained from women screened by visual inspection with acetic acid and hybrid capture 2.
Basu P; Kamal M; Ray C; Bhat D; Ghosh I; Mittal S; Chatterjee S; Samaddar A; Biswas J
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Sep; 32(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 23896715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cytology reproducibility and associated clinical and demographic factors.
Hwang H; Follen M; Guillaud M; Scheurer M; MacAulay C; MacAulay C; Staerkel GA; van Niekerk D; Yamal JM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 31639288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system.
McCluggage WG; Walsh MY; Thornton CM; Hamilton PW; Date A; Caughley LM; Bharucha H
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 105(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 9501788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. p16(INK4a) immunostaining as an alternative to histology review for reliable grading of cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Dijkstra MG; Heideman DA; de Roy SC; Rozendaal L; Berkhof J; van Krimpen K; van Groningen K; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):972-7. PubMed ID: 20924035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Creagh T; Bridger JE; Kupek E; Fish DE; Martin-Bates E; Wilkins MJ
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 7706521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal evaluation of interobserver and intraobserver agreement of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis among an experienced panel of gynecologic pathologists.
Cai B; Ronnett BM; Stoler M; Ferenczy A; Kurman RJ; Sadow D; Alvarez F; Pearson J; Sings HL; Barr E; Liaw KL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Dec; 31(12):1854-60. PubMed ID: 18043039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variability of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Heard I; Potard V; Bergeron C; Cartier I; Costagliola D
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 25132387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of endocervical curettage diagnoses.
Zahn CM; Rao LKF; Olsen C; Whitworth SA; Washington A; Crothers BA
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 118(2 Pt 1):240-248. PubMed ID: 21775838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.
Stoler MH; Schiffman M;
JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 11255427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic concordance in gynecologic cytology].
Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruiz PA; Martínez Arias C; Murguía Riechers L
Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9380963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Caughley LM; Date A; Hamilton PW; Thornton CM; Walsh MY
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 49(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 8943751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia.
de Vet HC; Knipschild PG; Schouten HJ; Koudstaal J; Kwee WS; Willebrand D; Sturmans F; Arends JW
J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(12):1395-8. PubMed ID: 2254777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Erozan YS; Wacholder S; Kurman RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ismail SM; Colclough AB; Dinnen JS; Eakins D; Evans DM; Gradwell E; O'Sullivan JP; Summerell JM; Newcombe RG
BMJ; 1989 Mar; 298(6675):707-10. PubMed ID: 2496816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical Glandular Cells: Interobserver Variability according to Clinical Management.
Lepe M; Eklund CM; Quddus MR; Paquette C
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):397-404. PubMed ID: 29969775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. P16INK4a immunohistochemistry improves the reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cone biopsies.
Gurrola-Díaz CM; Suárez-Rincón AE; Vázquez-Camacho G; Buonocunto-Vázquez G; Rosales-Quintana S; Wentzensen N; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18692882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program.
Mittal S; Ghosh I; Banerjee D; Singh P; Biswas J; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Ray C; Basu P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 24947603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
