These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16183157)

  • 1. Further evidence of preference reversals: choice, valuation and ranking over distributions of life expectancy.
    Oliver A
    J Health Econ; 2006 Sep; 25(5):803-20. PubMed ID: 16183157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing procedural invariance in the context of health.
    Oliver A
    Health Econ; 2013 Mar; 22(3):272-88. PubMed ID: 22278911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice-matching preference reversals in health outcome assessments.
    Sumner W; Nease RF
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 11386628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust me; I know what I am doing investigating the effect of choice list elicitation and domain-relevant training on preference reversals in decision making for others.
    Neumann-Böhme S; Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jul; 22(5):679-697. PubMed ID: 33743093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the rate of preference reversal in personal and social decision-making.
    Oliver A
    J Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 32(6):1250-7. PubMed ID: 24211758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference for equity as a framing effect.
    Ubel PA; Baron J; Asch DA
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(3):180-9. PubMed ID: 11386625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing preference reversals: The role of preference imprecision and nontransparent methods.
    Pinto-Prades JL; Sánchez-Martínez FI; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Martínez-Pérez JE
    Health Econ; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1230-1246. PubMed ID: 29770524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New evidence of preference reversals in health utility measurement.
    Bleichrodt H; Pinto Prades JL
    Health Econ; 2009 Jun; 18(6):713-26. PubMed ID: 18770525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis.
    van Til JA; Stiggelbout AM; Ijzerman MJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 18954956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The implications of using US-specific EQ-5D preference weights for cost-effectiveness evaluation.
    Noyes K; Dick AW; Holloway RG
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 17502449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency and equity: a stated preference approach.
    Norman R; Hall J; Street D; Viney R
    Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):568-81. PubMed ID: 22529053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
    Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer preferences for health and nonhealth outcomes of health promotion: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Alayli-Goebbels AF; Dellaert BG; Knox SA; Ament AJ; Lakerveld J; Bot SD; Nijpels G; Severens JL
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 23337222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment.
    Sculpher M; Bryan S; Fry P; de Winter P; Payne H; Emberton M
    BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7436):382. PubMed ID: 14751919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Societal preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.
    Harrison M; Marra C; Shojania K; Bansback N
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2015 Oct; 54(10):1816-25. PubMed ID: 25989956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values.
    Bansback N; Brazier J; Tsuchiya A; Anis A
    J Health Econ; 2012 Jan; 31(1):306-18. PubMed ID: 22197308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Did people "buy" what was "sold"? A qualitative evaluation of a contingent valuation survey information set for gains in life expectancy.
    Baker R; Bartczak A; Chilton S; Metcalf H
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():94-103. PubMed ID: 24374166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Community preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: a discrete choice study.
    Howard K; Jan S; Rose JM; Wong G; Irving M; Tong A; Craig JC; Chadban S; Allen RD; Cass A
    Transplantation; 2015 Mar; 99(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 25700169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
    Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliciting people's preferences for the distribution of health: A procedure for a more precise estimation of distributional weights.
    Maestad O; Norheim OF
    J Health Econ; 2009 May; 28(3):570-7. PubMed ID: 19368983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.