These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16183157)

  • 21. Self-rated life expectancy and lifetime socio-economic position: cross-sectional analysis of the British household panel survey.
    Popham F; Mitchell R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 17092949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The choice is yours? How women with ovarian cancer make sense of treatment choices.
    Ziebland S; Evans J; McPherson A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Sep; 62(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 16876377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete-choice contingent valuation.
    Yeung RY; Smith RD; Ho LM; Johnston JM; Leung GM
    Health Econ; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1077-89. PubMed ID: 16518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do NHS clinicians and members of the public share the same views about reducing inequalities in health?
    Tsuchiya A; Dolan P
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jun; 64(12):2499-503. PubMed ID: 17449155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do we get it right? Radiation oncology outpatients' perceptions of the patient centredness of life expectancy disclosure.
    Mackenzie LJ; Carey ML; Paul CL; Sanson-Fisher RW; D'Este CA
    Psychooncology; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2720-8. PubMed ID: 23801643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Saving lives versus life-years in rural Bangladesh: an ethical preferences approach.
    Johansson-Stenman O; Mahmud M; Martinsson P
    Health Econ; 2011 Jun; 20(6):723-36. PubMed ID: 20575149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monetary Valuation of Informal Care Based on Carers' and Noncarers' Preferences.
    Garrido-García S; Sánchez-Martínez FI; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; van Exel J
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):832-40. PubMed ID: 26409611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic.
    Dolan P; Stalmeier P
    J Health Econ; 2003 May; 22(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 12683961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment.
    Weisberg E; Bateson D; Knox S; Haas M; Viney R; Street D; Fiebig D
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2013 Jun; 18(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 23557397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why contextual preference reversals maximize expected value.
    Howes A; Warren PA; Farmer G; El-Deredy W; Lewis RL
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jul; 123(4):368-91. PubMed ID: 27337391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The neural dissociation of subjective valuation from choice processes in intertemporal choice.
    Liu L; Feng T; Wang J; Li H
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 May; 231(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22406016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach.
    Karousakis K; Birol E
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1099-108. PubMed ID: 17658678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: a discrete choice experiment.
    Wijnen BF; de Kinderen RJ; Colon AJ; Dirksen CD; Essers BA; Hiligsmann M; Leijten FS; Ossenblok PP; Evers SM
    Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Feb; 31():102-9. PubMed ID: 24389020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.
    Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Priority preferences: "end of life" does not matter, but total life does.
    Olsen JA
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):1063-6. PubMed ID: 24041356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A pilot Internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance.
    Stein K; Dyer M; Crabb T; Milne R; Round A; Ratcliffe J; Brazier J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Nov; 4():90. PubMed ID: 17129380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared.
    Lambooij MS; Harmsen IA; Veldwijk J; de Melker H; Mollema L; van Weert YW; de Wit GA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():19. PubMed ID: 25887890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Options as information: rational reversals of evaluation and preference.
    Sher S; McKenzie CR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1127-43. PubMed ID: 24364684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.