These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16184536)

  • 1. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on in vitro wear of experimental hybrid resin composite.
    Musanje L; Ferracane JL; Ferracane LL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Apr; 77(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 16184536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on the properties of experimental hybrid resin composite.
    Musanje L; Ferracane JL
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4065-71. PubMed ID: 15046897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites.
    Lim BS; Ferracane JL; Condon JR; Adey JD
    Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11740959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials.
    Yesil ZD; Alapati S; Johnston W; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 18514665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment.
    Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 9207774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of nanofiller on wear resistance and surface roughness of resin composites.
    Han JM; Lin H; Zheng G; Shinya A; Gomi H; Shinya A; Lin J
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 22866282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance.
    Kawai K; Iwami Y; Ebisu S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 9610853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure.
    Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC; Condon JR; Todd R
    J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1508-16. PubMed ID: 9240388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage on glass fiber reinforced filling material.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 17675144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-body wear of dental resin composites reinforced with silica-fused whiskers.
    Xu HH; Quinn JB; Giuseppetti AA; Eichmiller FC; Parry EE; Schumacher GE
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 15209227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites.
    Ellakwa A; Cho N; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 17182093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rheological properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA flowable resin composites with various macrofiller/microfiller ratio.
    Beun S; Bailly C; Dabin A; Vreven J; Devaux J; Leloup G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 18620747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of adding a new monomer "Phene" on the polymerization shrinkage reduction of a dental resin composite.
    He J; Garoushi S; Säilynoja E; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
    Dent Mater; 2019 Apr; 35(4):627-635. PubMed ID: 30797550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of nanofiller on the opacity of experimental composites.
    Kim JJ; Moon HJ; Lim BS; Lee YK; Rhee SH; Yang HC
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2007 Feb; 80(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 16850469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods--a review.
    Turssi CP; De Moraes Purquerio B; Serra MC
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2003 May; 65(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 12687721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
    Schultz S; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 19907723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.