381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16184655)
1. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to Sarah Burns.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Adding constitutional depravation to untimely death: South Dakota's living will pregnancy provision.
Matchan HE; Sheffield KE
S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):388-412. PubMed ID: 16086521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant embodiment and women's autonomy rights in law: an analysis of the language and politics of Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.
Randall M
Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(2):515-42. PubMed ID: 12769105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A pregnant woman's decision to decline treatment: how should the law respond?
Seymour J
J Law Med; 1994 Aug; 2(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 11660250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. States struggle with new ethical questions over the beginning, end of life.
Moskowitz DB
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(3):46-9. PubMed ID: 10125736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
Shultz MM
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
Callahan J
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
Kolner SJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers.
Norz F
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.
Solomon RI
Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
Morris C
UCLA Womens Law J; 1997; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
