380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16184655)
21. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
Procaccino JA
Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
Tweedt DE
Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
Horttor BJ
N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: best brief.
Bonsall L; Weber T
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):467-94. PubMed ID: 19953403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
Pope T
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
Gostin L
Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [End-of-life decisions for patients with dementia and the vegetative state].
Jox RJ; Kühlmeyer K; Borasio GD
MMW Fortschr Med; 2011 Sep; 153(37):31-2, 34. PubMed ID: 21950185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
Weinberg SR
Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa.
McGregor M; Moore R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
Bower HR
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
Pachman TS
Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
Walen A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
Janssen ND
Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
