These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16184655)

  • 81. Webster, vagueness and the First Amendment.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 2603865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children?
    Kerian CL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [Discontinuing treatment in the intensive care unit--a case example: still a taboo?].
    Eisenberg J
    Pflege Z; 2009 Nov; 62(11):659-61. PubMed ID: 19960926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Redrafting Ohio's advance directive laws.
    Martyn SR; Reagan JE; Minogue B; Dippel DL; Schimer MR; Taraszewski R
    Akron Law Rev; 1992; 26(2):229-92. PubMed ID: 16506326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
    Peto A; Kossuth E
    Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Do pregnant women have (living) will?
    Sperling D
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):331-42. PubMed ID: 16471028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Maintaining a pregnancy following loss of capacity.
    Peart NS; Campbell AV; Manara AR; Renowden SA; Stirrat GM
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 11885615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Maternal substance abuse during pregnancy. Policy implications in the United States.
    Merrick JC
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 8463751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Job in court.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 10587807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. [What is changing, what is becoming simpler--and where there are dangers. What will the new regulation for patient advance directives entail?].
    Gross H
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Aug; 151(34-35):14-7. PubMed ID: 19771781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Brain death in pregnant women.
    Kantor JE; Hoskins IA
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 7803825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Rights discourse and mandatory HIV testing of pregnant women and newborns.
    Sinton J
    J Law Policy; 1997; 6(1):187-245. PubMed ID: 16596752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law.
    Funk N
    Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Are pregnant women autonomous decision makers?
    Murphy EK
    Nurs Outlook; 1991; 39(3):144. PubMed ID: 2027801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
    Sterns ML
    New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.