310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16184674)
21. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Peters PG
Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The legacy of the Schiavo case: the atmosphere around end-of-life decisions has changed.
Shannon TA
America (NY); 2005 Jun 6-13; 192(20):17-9. PubMed ID: 16175697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Withdrawal of life support care is an ethical decision].
Engström I
Lakartidningen; 2011 May 25-31; 108(21):1168-9. PubMed ID: 21812238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The church, the law, and the advancing armies of death.
Hentoff N
Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15999427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A ''minor'' decision: right to die or manslaughter?
Baumrucker SJ; Morris GM; Stolick M; Vandekieft G
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2010 Sep; 27(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 20693520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Not discontinuing treatment but adapting it].
Pflege Z; 2004 Jun; 57(6):376. PubMed ID: 15330232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Proportionate and disproportionate treatment, exaggerated treatment and palliative care.
Eijk WJ
Dolentium Hominum; 2005; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16317824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
Martino M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. End-of-life decisions: ethical principles.
Myers J
Origins; 2005 Sep; 35(15):248-53. PubMed ID: 16276668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Nancy Cruzan and the "right to die"--a Jewish perspective.
Washofsky M
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):5-10. PubMed ID: 16038074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. What medicine and the law should do for the physician-assisted suicide debate.
Fins JJ
CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):46-53. PubMed ID: 15712422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The constitution in a brave new world: a century of technological change and constitutional law.
Merritt DJ
Oregon Law Rev; 1990; 69(1):1-45. PubMed ID: 16044610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jul; (137):7-38. PubMed ID: 10105837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On life-sustaining treatments and the vegetative state--scientific advances and ethical dilemmas.
John Paul II P
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(2):367-70. PubMed ID: 15281185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn?
Frelick RW
Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
