These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16185700)

  • 1. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16185700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: a probabilistic study.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Fields A; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2212-21. PubMed ID: 17004268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics.
    Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 15598460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hopkins AR; New AM; Rodriguez-y-Baena F; Taylor M
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19897397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-platform comparison of efficient probabilistic methods in the prediction of total knee replacement mechanics.
    Strickland MA; Arsene CT; Pal S; Laz PJ; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Dec; 13(6):701-9. PubMed ID: 20162473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics.
    Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Fitzpatrick CK; Deacy JS; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 22209313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.
    Baldwin MA; Clary C; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2341-8. PubMed ID: 19720376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior stabilized versus cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty designs: conformity affects the performance reliability of the design over the patient population.
    Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Maniei E; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 25703743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
    Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting knee replacement damage in a simulator machine using a computational model with a consistent wear factor.
    Zhao D; Sakoda H; Sawyer WG; Banks SA; Fregly BJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Feb; 130(1):011004. PubMed ID: 18298180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of the geometry of total knee implant in the sagittal plane using FEA.
    Dargahi J; Najarian S; Amiri S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 14646058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying alignment parameters affecting implanted patellofemoral mechanics.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Wright A; Laz PJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):1167-75. PubMed ID: 22570224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading.
    Knight LA; Pal S; Coleman JC; Bronson F; Haider H; Levine DL; Taylor M; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 17084405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative contributions of design, alignment, and loading variability in knee replacement mechanics.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Laz PJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Dec; 30(12):2015-24. PubMed ID: 22696429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computationally efficient finite element evaluation of natural patellofemoral mechanics.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Baldwin MA; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Dec; 132(12):121013. PubMed ID: 21142327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Aug; 45(12):2092-102. PubMed ID: 22727219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic modeling of knee muscle moment arms: effects of methods, origin-insertion, and kinematic variability.
    Pal S; Langenderfer JE; Stowe JQ; Laz PJ; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 35(9):1632-42. PubMed ID: 17546504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Targeted computational probabilistic corroboration of experimental knee wear simulator: the importance of accounting for variability.
    Strickland MA; Dressler MR; Render T; Browne M; Taylor M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Apr; 33(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21075032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A subject specific multibody model of the knee with menisci.
    Guess TM; Thiagarajan G; Kia M; Mishra M
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 20359933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator.
    Halloran JP; Clary CW; Maletsky LP; Taylor M; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081010. PubMed ID: 20670059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.