199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16186202)
1. Commentary: refusing to give up on forensic research.
Young JL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):368-70. PubMed ID: 16186202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The new research ethic: will oversight requirements sink forensic research?
Candilis PJ; Arikan R; Noone SB; Holzer JC
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 16186201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making pragmatism practicable for the institutional review board.
Robertson C
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Apr; 8(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 18576258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Kaktins NM
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The institutional review board: a critical revisit to the protection of human subjects.
Rutecki GW; Youtsey M; Adelson B
Ethics Med; 2002; 18(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 14700023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
Enfield KB; Truwit JD
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Obstacles to research in forensic psychiatry.
Hillbrand M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 16186190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
Lynn MR; Nelson DK
Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics: reports, scandals, calls for change.
Hanna KE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(6):6. PubMed ID: 11475997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards and approval of new products without human subjects research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jul; 17(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ethical review of health care quality improvement initiatives: findings from the field.
Taylor HA; Pronovost PJ; Faden RR; Kass NE; Sugarman J
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2010 Aug; 95():1-12. PubMed ID: 20726137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction to research ethics.
Wang JJ
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):3, 14. PubMed ID: 12542033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
Wegman DH; Major E
Am J Ind Med; 2009 Feb; 52(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 19016264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research ethics committee: getting started.
Macpherson CC
West Indian Med J; 2001 Sep; 50(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 11769020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Has compliance eclipsed ethics? Should we expect serious ethical consideration or give up and admit that regulations are the only hope?
Dubler N; Barnes M
Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):7-9. PubMed ID: 16317857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Independent Ethics Committees for clinical research in Argentina. An evaluation and a system to guarantee their independence].
Moschini J
Medicina (B Aires); 2009; 69(1 Pt 2):204-5; author reply 205. PubMed ID: 19414309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
