128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16186353)
1. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.
Gardiner SK; Johnson CA; Cioffi GA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3712-7. PubMed ID: 16186353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining ganglion cell topology and data of patients with glaucoma to determine a structure-function map.
Turpin A; Sampson GP; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3249-56. PubMed ID: 19324839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between hemifield visual field damage and corresponding parapapillary atrophy in normal-tension glaucoma.
Kawano J; Tomidokoro A; Mayama C; Kunimatsu S; Tomita G; Araie M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 16815249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationships between standard automated perimetry, HRT confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry.
Reus NJ; Lemij HG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 46(11):4182-8. PubMed ID: 16249497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intereye spatial relationship of abnormal neuroretinal rim locations in glaucoma patients from the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Hoffmann EM; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Crowston JG; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):781-7. PubMed ID: 17379176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Garway-Heath DF; Fogagnolo P; García-Feijoo J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 49(7):3018-25. PubMed ID: 18378581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical variables associated with glaucomatous injury in eyes with large optic disc cupping.
Greenfield DS; Bagga H
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 16238039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regression analysis of ranked segment parameters for optic nerve head classification: a pilot study.
Cubbidge RP; Hosking SL; Hilton EJ; Gibson JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Mar; 27(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 17324210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images.
Swindale NV; Stjepanovic G; Chin A; Mikelberg FS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1730-42. PubMed ID: 10845593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
