171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16186653)
1. Comparing hypothetical structures generated in the third Cambridge blind test of crystal structure prediction.
van Eijck BP
Acta Crystallogr B; 2005 Oct; 61(Pt 5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16186653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A third blind test of crystal structure prediction.
Day GM; Motherwell WD; Ammon HL; Boerrigter SX; Della Valle RG; Venuti E; Dzyabchenko A; Dunitz JD; Schweizer B; van Eijck BP; Erk P; Facelli JC; Bazterra VE; Ferraro MB; Hofmann DW; Leusen FJ; Liang C; Pantelides CC; Karamertzanis PG; Price SL; Lewis TC; Nowell H; Torrisi A; Scheraga HA; Arnautova YA; Schmidt MU; Verwer P
Acta Crystallogr B; 2005 Oct; 61(Pt 5):511-27. PubMed ID: 16186652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting the blind tests in crystal structure prediction: accurate energy ranking of molecular crystals.
Asmadi A; Neumann MA; Kendrick J; Girard P; Perrin MA; Leusen FJ
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Dec; 113(51):16303-13. PubMed ID: 19950907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crystal structure prediction and isostructurality of three small organic halogen compounds.
Asmadi A; Kendrick J; Leusen FJ
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Aug; 12(30):8571-9. PubMed ID: 20532368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Searching the Cambridge Structural Database for polymorphs.
van de Streek J; Motherwell S
Acta Crystallogr B; 2005 Oct; 61(Pt 5):504-10. PubMed ID: 16186651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crystal structure prediction and isostructurality of three small molecules.
Asmadi A; Kendrick J; Leusen FJ
Chemistry; 2010 Nov; 16(42):12701-9. PubMed ID: 20857394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MIMUMBA revisited: torsion angle rules for conformer generation derived from X-ray structures.
Sadowski J; Boström J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2305-9. PubMed ID: 17125173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A strategy for predicting the crystal structures of flexible molecules: the polymorphism of phenobarbital.
Day GM; S Motherwell WD; Jones W
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 9(14):1693-704. PubMed ID: 17396181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a search technique for crystal structure prediction of flexible molecules by application to piracetam.
Nowell H; Price SL
Acta Crystallogr B; 2005 Oct; 61(Pt 5):558-68. PubMed ID: 16186656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges of crystal structure prediction of diastereomeric salt pairs.
Karamertzanis PG; Price SL
J Phys Chem B; 2005 Sep; 109(36):17134-50. PubMed ID: 16853186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes.
Schüttelkopf AW; van Aalten DM
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2004 Aug; 60(Pt 8):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15272157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overcoming entropic barrier with coupled sampling at dual resolutions.
Lwin TZ; Luo R
J Chem Phys; 2005 Nov; 123(19):194904. PubMed ID: 16321110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tailor-made force fields for crystal-structure prediction.
Neumann MA
J Phys Chem B; 2008 Aug; 112(32):9810-29. PubMed ID: 18642947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictability of the polymorphs of small organic compounds: crystal structure predictions of four benchmark blind test molecules.
Chan HC; Kendrick J; Leusen FJ
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Dec; 13(45):20361-70. PubMed ID: 21993855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular recognition and crystal energy landscapes: an X-ray and computational study of caffeine and other methylxanthines.
Carlucci L; Gavezzotti A
Chemistry; 2004 Dec; 11(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 15551321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Representing structural databases in a self-organizing map.
Wehrens R; Melssen W; Buydens L; de Gelder R
Acta Crystallogr B; 2005 Oct; 61(Pt 5):548-57. PubMed ID: 16186655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space.
Krieger E; Darden T; Nabuurs SB; Finkelstein A; Vriend G
Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 15390263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantum chemistry can locally improve protein crystal structures.
Ryde U; Nilsson K
J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Nov; 125(47):14232-3. PubMed ID: 14624544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
