147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1618713)
1. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
Brown M; Shepherd RK; Webster WR; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Middle-latency responses. II. Variation among stimulation sites.
Burton MJ; Miller JM; Kileny PR
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Apr; 115(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 2923689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
Snyder RL; Middlebrooks JC; Bonham BH
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic electrical stimulation reverses deafness-related depression of electrically evoked 2-deoxyglucose activity in the guinea pig inferior colliculus.
Schwartz DR; Schacht J; Miller JM; Frey K; Altschuler RA
Hear Res; 1993 Nov; 70(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 8294268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
Liu A; Wang Z; Cui Y; Zhou L; Chi F
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological and physiological effects of the central auditory prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes.
Liu X; McPhee G; Seldon HL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):264-74. PubMed ID: 9447940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Hartmann R; Klinke R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats.
Shepherd RK; Baxi JH; Hardie NA
J Neurophysiol; 1999 Sep; 82(3):1363-80. PubMed ID: 10482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory neural activity evoked by pure-tone stimulation as a function of intensity.
Ryan AF; Braverman S; Woolf NK; Axelsson GA
Brain Res; 1989 Apr; 483(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 2706521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
