BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1618713)

  • 21. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results.
    Walsh SM; Leake-Jones PA
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 7118732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration.
    Saito H; Miller JM; Pfingst BE; Altschuler RA
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):139-61. PubMed ID: 10336066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preservation of auditory brainstem response thresholds after cochleostomy and titanium microactuator implantation in the lateral wall of cat scala tympani.
    Lesinski SG; Prewitt J; Bray V; Aravamudhan R; Bermeo Blanco OA; Farmer-Fedor BL; Ward JA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):730-8. PubMed ID: 24622027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.
    Hardie NA; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 128(1-2):147-65. PubMed ID: 10082295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J; Hartmann R; Syka J; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 2-Deoxyglucose uptake patterns in response to pure tone stimuli in the aged rat inferior colliculus.
    Keithley EM; Lo J; Ryan AF
    Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 80(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 7852206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of site of stimulation on the guinea pig's electrically evoked brain stem response.
    Marsh RR; Yamane H; Potsic WP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981; 89(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 6784070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array.
    Hillman T; Badi AN; Normann RA; Kertesz T; Shelton C
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):764-8. PubMed ID: 14501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.
    Beitel RE; Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10686430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: surface vs. penetrating stimulation.
    el-Kashlan HK; Niparko JK; Altschuler RA; Miller JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Oct; 105(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 1762791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
    Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
    Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2588-603. PubMed ID: 17855592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
    Rebscher SJ; Hetherington AM; Snyder RL; Leake PA; Bonham BH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Far-field responses to stimulation of the cochlear nucleus by microsurgically placed penetrating and surface electrodes in the cat.
    Rosahl SK; Mark G; Herzog M; Pantazis C; Gharabaghi F; Matthies C; Brinker T; Samii M
    J Neurosurg; 2001 Nov; 95(5):845-52. PubMed ID: 11702876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.