These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16187247)

  • 1. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
    Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-frequency threshold measurements using insert earphones.
    Tang H; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):378-9. PubMed ID: 1487097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Extended high-frequency audiometry--reproducibility of two type of earphones].
    Schmuziger N; Gantenbein M; Smurzynski J; Bertoli S; Probst R
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():75S-76S. PubMed ID: 11141946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.
    Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of hearing thresholds: computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):567-81. PubMed ID: 11732834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability of high-frequency thresholds at bedside with sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.
    Sinks BC; Goebel JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Nov; 5(6):399-401. PubMed ID: 7858301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of audiometric thresholds obtained with insert earphones when used by certified audiometric technicians.
    Bell-Lehmkuhler B; Meinke DK; Sedey A; Tuell C
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):59-68. PubMed ID: 19265255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and evaluation of a portable audiometer for high-frequency screening of hearing loss from ototoxicity in homes/clinics.
    Jacobs PG; Silaski G; Wilmington D; Gordon S; Helt W; McMillan G; Fausti SA; Dille M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 59(11):3097-103. PubMed ID: 22801480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.