187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16187570)
1. Private v. public. Canada's Supreme Court decision shakes fundamentals of system.
Fuller C
Revolution (Oakl); 2005; 6(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 16187570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right.
Flood CM; Sullivan T
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Private medical care comes to Canada.
CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):225, 227. PubMed ID: 16076799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal health information: the "scope" issues.
Fineberg AD
Health Law Can; 2003 May; 23(4):53-70. PubMed ID: 12845931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Canada's Supreme Court invites privatization.
Fuller C
Revolution (Oakl); 2005; 6(3):13. PubMed ID: 16092477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescription drug benefits for seniors and public/private collaboration.
Brekke M
Beginnings; 2002; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 12046112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tony Clement appointed as Canada's new health minister.
Kondro W; Sibbald B
CMAJ; 2006 Mar; 174(6):754. PubMed ID: 16534074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is Canada odd? A comparison of European and Canadian approaches to choice and regulation of the public/private divide in health care.
Flood CM; Haugan A
Health Econ Policy Law; 2010 Jul; 5(3):319-41. PubMed ID: 20602857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visions of our Medicare future: status quo has become a dirty word in Canadian health care.
Gray C
CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(5):693-6. PubMed ID: 8603326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Policy choice or economic fundamentals: what drives the public-private health expenditure balance in Canada?
Di Matteo L
Health Econ Policy Law; 2009 Jan; 4(Pt 1):29-53. PubMed ID: 19099616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing private delivery of publicly funded services?
Pindera L
CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):167. PubMed ID: 15655232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Oct; 11(4):253-4. PubMed ID: 17018202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Amend or repeal? How New Zealand tackled unpopular healthcare legislation.
Powell I; McKee M
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1502. PubMed ID: 25804955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The private sector invades Medicare's home town.
Gray C
CMAJ; 1998 Jul; 159(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 9700332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health system reform: from concept to action.
Roberts NK
J Insur Med; 1993; 25(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 10150787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jan; 8(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 12683436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Canada's ObamaCare precedent.
Gratzer D
Mo Med; 2009; 106(5):318-9. PubMed ID: 19902709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Chaoulli case: one-tier medicine goes on trial in Quebec.
Pinker S
CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1305-6. PubMed ID: 10584098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public health care challenged in BC court.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E333-E334. PubMed ID: 27620633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
