These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16187872)
1. The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: a comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Brosch T; Sharma D Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 16187872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fear, but not fear-relevance, modulates reaction times in visual search with animal distractors. Soares SC; Esteves F; Flykt A J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Jan; 23(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18565724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Better safe than sorry: simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention. Forbes SJ; Purkis HM; Lipp OV Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):794-804. PubMed ID: 21824021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Of snakes and flowers: does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance? Lipp OV Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 16768561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of disgust on anxiety ratings to fear-relevant, disgust-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli. Davey GC; Macdonald BA; Brierley L J Anxiety Disord; 2008 Dec; 22(8):1347-54. PubMed ID: 18343631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual search with biological threat stimuli: accuracy, reaction times, and heart rate changes. Flykt A Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16187870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Lipp OV; Derakshan N Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 16187873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Snakes and cats in the flower bed: fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals. Lipp OV; Derakshan N; Waters AM; Logies S Emotion; 2004 Sep; 4(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 15456393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Danger is worse when it moves: neural and behavioral indices of enhanced attentional capture by dynamic threatening stimuli. Carretié L; Hinojosa JA; López-Martín S; Albert J; Tapia M; Pozo MA Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 18835285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field? Snow JC; Mattingley JB Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: how specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Blanchette I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1484-504. PubMed ID: 16846972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cartwright-Finch U; Lavie N Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):321-40. PubMed ID: 16480973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impaired prioritization of novel onset stimuli in autism spectrum disorder. Keehn B; Joseph RM J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1296-303. PubMed ID: 19120708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phylo- and ontogenetic fears and the expectation of danger: differences between spider- and flight-phobic subjects in cognitive and physiological responses to disorder-specific stimuli. Mühlberger A; Wiedemann G; Herrmann MJ; Pauli P J Abnorm Psychol; 2006 Aug; 115(3):580-9. PubMed ID: 16866598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]