These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16187876)

  • 1. Cognitive control in closed head injury: context maintenance dysfunction or prepotent response inhibition deficit?
    Seignourel PJ; Robins DL; Larson MJ; Demery JA; Cole M; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Sep; 19(5):578-90. PubMed ID: 16187876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and response inhibition after closed head injury in children: do preinjury behavior and injury severity predict outcome?
    Schachar R; Levin HS; Max JE; Purvis K; Chen S
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2004; 25(1-2):179-98. PubMed ID: 14984334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention deficits following severe closed head injury: the role of inhibitory processes.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Jul; 19(4):476-83. PubMed ID: 16060822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury.
    Azouvi P; Couillet J; Leclercq M; Martin Y; Asloun S; Rousseaux M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1260-8. PubMed ID: 15178177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.
    Gupta R; Kar BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():259-76. PubMed ID: 19733762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measures of prefrontal dysfunction after closed head injury.
    Gansler DA; Covall S; McGrath N; Oscar-Berman M
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Mar; 30(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 8811997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval inhibition in directed forgetting following severe closed-head injury.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Marks W; Wright MJ; Ventura M
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jan; 18(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 14744193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued-Stroop task.
    Perlstein WM; Larson MJ; Dotson VM; Kelly KG
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 15979655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI.
    Spikman JM; Kiers HA; Deelman BG; van Zomeren AH
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):446-60. PubMed ID: 11748900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective and retrospective components in the memory for actions to be performed in patients with severe closed-head injury.
    Carlesimo GA; Casadio P; Caltagirone C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Sep; 10(5):679-88. PubMed ID: 15327715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive slowing in closed-head injury.
    Ferraro FR
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Dec; 32(3):429-40. PubMed ID: 8975681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Belleville S; Rouleau N; Van der Linden M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 16757076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary examination of cognitive reserve theory in closed head injury.
    Ropacki MT; Elias JW
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Aug; 18(6):643-54. PubMed ID: 14591438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Content memory and temporal order memory for performed activities after severe closed-head injury.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Wright MJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Oct; 25(7):933-48. PubMed ID: 13680441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating working memory capacity and context-processing views of cognitive control.
    Redick TS; Engle RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1048-55. PubMed ID: 21644190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibitory deficits for negative information in persons with major depressive disorder.
    Lau MA; Christensen BK; Hawley LL; Gemar MS; Segal ZV
    Psychol Med; 2007 Sep; 37(9):1249-59. PubMed ID: 17451630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treating underlying attention deficits as a means for improving conversational discourse in individuals with closed head injury: a preliminary study.
    Youse KM; Coelho CA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2009; 24(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 19597274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.