These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16187885)

  • 1. Evaluation of criteria for classical dissociations in single-case studies by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Sep; 19(5):664-78. PubMed ID: 16187885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting dissociations in single-case studies: Type I errors, statistical power and the classical versus strong distinction.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2249-58. PubMed ID: 16820178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):318-31. PubMed ID: 15910118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of testing for a deficit in single-case studies: Evaluation of statistical power by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):877-904. PubMed ID: 21049358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wanted: fully operational definitions of dissociations in single-case studies.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Gray CD
    Cortex; 2003 Apr; 39(2):357-70. PubMed ID: 12784893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple dissociations for a higher-powered neuropsychology.
    McIntosh RD
    Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():256-265. PubMed ID: 29673782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category deficits and paradoxical dissociations in Alzheimer's disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis.
    Laws KR; Sartori G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1453-9. PubMed ID: 16197698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-individual measures of association in neuropsychology: inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control or normative sample.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC; Venneri A
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Nov; 9(7):989-1000. PubMed ID: 14738281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing a single case to a control sample: testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Ryan K
    Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1166-78. PubMed ID: 21458788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On comparing a single case with a control sample: an alternative perspective.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2690-5. PubMed ID: 19383506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximizing the power of comparing single cases against a control sample: an argument, a program for making comparisons, and a worked example from the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 24(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 18416492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
    Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing a single case with a control sample: refinements and extensions.
    Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2687-9. PubMed ID: 19383504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing a single case with a control sample: correction and further comment.
    Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2696-7. PubMed ID: 19383507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferential methods for comparing two single cases.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Wood LT
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Jul; 27(5):377-400. PubMed ID: 21718213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.