These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16188360)
1. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe. Tencalla F Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe. Einsele A Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GM crops: science, politics and communication. Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe. Lusk JL; Rozan A Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Bradford KJ; Van Deynze A; Gutterson N; Parrott W; Strauss SH Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 15815671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientists cry foul as Europe plays politics with GM crops. Hodgson J Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 18259156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Democratization is more than lower prices. Cayford J Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Global trends in plant transgenic science and technology (1973-2003). Vain P Trends Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):206-11. PubMed ID: 16569453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Africa's inevitable walk to genetically modified (GM) crops: opportunities and challenges for commercialization. Okeno JA; Wolt JD; Misra MK; Rodriguez L N Biotechnol; 2013 Jan; 30(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 22985799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Smyth S; McHughen A Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant science. China plans $3.5 billion GM crops initiative. Stone R Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5894):1279. PubMed ID: 18772402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic technologies. Genomics, genetic engineering, and domestication of crops. Strauss SH Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):61-2. PubMed ID: 12677045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective. Vasil IK Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation. Craddock N Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legislation governing genetically modified and genome-edited crops in Europe: the need for change. Halford NG J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jan; 99(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 29952140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Placing on the market, breeders rights and growing genetically modified (GM) varieties]. Dattée Y J Soc Biol; 2009; 203(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 20122393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]