367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16188399)
21. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programme in the Harare City Health Department, Zimbabwe.
Moyo IM; Koni NP; Makunike B; Hipshman J; Makaure HK; Gumbo N
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Aug; 43(8):223-5. PubMed ID: 9431759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).
Saraiya M; Irwin KL; Carlin L; Chen X; Jain N; Benard V; Montano DE
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 17628488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Proposal of cervical cancer early detection programme in Croatia].
Znaor A; Babić D; Corusić A; Grce M; Mahovlić V; Pajtler M; Serman A
Lijec Vjesn; 2007 May; 129(5):158-63. PubMed ID: 17695198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service.
Couzos S; Wronski I; Murray R; Cox H
Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 27(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 9581335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pap screening in a U.S. health plan.
Insinga RP; Glass AG; Rush BB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 15006908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical cancer screening programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia--the results of the pilot study.
Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Ostojić DV; Stemberger-Papić S; Janković S; Glibotić-Kresina H; Brncić-Fischer A; Benić-Salamon K
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 20437641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of laboratory reports to assess cervical cancer screening in a community.
Orr ST; Celentano DD; Hill G; Erozan YS; Shediac M; Correa-Villasenor A; Matanoski G
Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 7803067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical cancer screening among elderly urban women in a primary care setting.
Wong QC; Collins R; Kalkstein K; Roth A; Gintautas J
Proc West Pharmacol Soc; 2005; 48():154-6. PubMed ID: 16416686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The roles of citizenship status, acculturation, and health insurance in breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrant women.
Echeverria SE; Carrasquillo O
Med Care; 2006 Aug; 44(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 16862042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
