These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16188457)

  • 1. Optimizing telephone-based population sampling.
    Galea S; Bucuvalas MJ
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 16188457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random digit dialing and directory-based samples in telephone surveys of HIV risk: a comparison from the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.
    Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 15(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 15723770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [New outcome rates for random sampling telephone surveys].
    Guilbert P; Beltzer N; Gautier A; Warszawski J; Riandey B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2011 Apr; 59(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 21397420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chapter I. Study design.
    Cannell CF; Groves RM; Miller PV; Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):5-10. PubMed ID: 15791750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An experimental comparison of telephone and personal health interview surveys.
    Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):1-4. PubMed ID: 15791749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing telephone-based population sampling--a reply.
    Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 16(9):734-5. PubMed ID: 16911904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators.
    Link MW; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR; Osborn L; Mokdad AH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 164(10):1019-25. PubMed ID: 16968861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do public health surveys provide representative data? Comparison of three different sampling approaches in the adult population of Croatia.
    Kolcić I; Polasek O
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Apr; 33 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19563162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chapter III. Experimental interviewing techniques.
    Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):20-5. PubMed ID: 15791752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
    Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate.
    Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chapter VI. Measurement of interviewer errors in the SRC Telephone Survey.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):40-6. PubMed ID: 15791755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Given the increasing bias in random digit dial sampling, could respondent-driven sampling be a practical alternative?
    Lee R; Ranaldi J; Cummings M; Crucetti JB; Stratton H; McNutt LA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21376274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redesigning the National Health Interview Survey.
    Massey JT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1989 Aug; (110):6-17. PubMed ID: 2800355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing representativeness of sampling methods for reaching men who have sex with men: a direct comparison of results obtained from convenience and probability samples.
    Schwarcz S; Spindler H; Scheer S; Valleroy L; Lansky A
    AIDS Behav; 2007 Jul; 11(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 17436073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chapter VII. Nonsampling bias and variance in the SRC Telephone Survey data.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):47-50. PubMed ID: 15791756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The future of random-digit-dial surveys for injury prevention and violence research.
    Link MW; Kresnow MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 17046417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tutorial: planning for data collection. Part III--Sample size.
    Plsek PE
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1994; 3(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 10139251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Balancing quality and cost for Adult Tobacco Telephone Surveys.
    Fernandez BM; Hannah KM; Wallack RS; Hicks JK; Gorrigan AM; Mariolis P
    Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31(3):284-96. PubMed ID: 17402868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.