These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16188591)

  • 1. Internal defibrillation with minimal skeletal muscle activation: a new paradigm toward painless defibrillation.
    Jayam V; Zviman M; Jayanti V; Roguin A; Halperin H; Berger RD
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Oct; 2(10):1108-13. PubMed ID: 16188591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel electrode design for potentially painless internal defibrillation also allows for successful external defibrillation.
    Jayanti V; Zviman MM; Nazarian S; Halperin HR; Berger RD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Sep; 18(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 17711432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Michael Faraday and painless defibrillation.
    Roth BJ
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Oct; 2(10):1114-5. PubMed ID: 16188592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tetanizing prepulse: A novel strategy to mitigate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock-related pain.
    Hunter DW; Tandri H; Halperin H; Tung L; Berger RD
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 May; 13(5):1142-1148. PubMed ID: 26767423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.
    Dosdall DJ; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Mar; 4(3 Suppl):S51-6. PubMed ID: 17336885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ; Rothe DE; Brandon TA; Sweeney JD
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
    Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
    Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
    Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and site of initiation on the defibrillation threshold during early ventricular fibrillation.
    Strobel JS; Kenknight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 32(2):521-7. PubMed ID: 9708486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation.
    Jung W; Manz M; Moosdorf R; Spehl S; Wolpert C; Korte T; Lüderitz B
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.