These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189463)

  • 1. Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases.
    Shim CS; Lee S; Maeng DH; Lee SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Oct; 18(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 16189463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure analysis of C-5 after total disc replacement with ProDisc-C at 1 and 2 levels and in combination with a fusion cage: finite-element and biomechanical models.
    Completo A; Nascimento A; Ramos A; Simões J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jun; 22(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 25746118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2230-6. PubMed ID: 16205353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior avulsion fracture at adjacent vertebral body during cervical disc replacement with ProDisc-C: a case report.
    Shim CS; Shin HD; Lee SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Aug; 20(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 17970189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertebral body split fracture after a single-level cervical total disc replacement.
    Tu TH; Wu JC; Fay LY; Ko CC; Huang WC; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 22176434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Keel-based lumbar total disk replacement: Prodisc-L and Prodisc-O].
    Ogon M; Tuschel A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Nov; 22(5-6):593-607. PubMed ID: 21153016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique.
    Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Marnay T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1():50-64. PubMed ID: 16510800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.
    Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Marnay T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 12902952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices.
    Ryu KS; Park CK; Jun SC; Huh HY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20809721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
    Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study.
    Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S163-6. PubMed ID: 14560187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.
    Zigler JE; Burd TA; Vialle EN; Sachs BL; Rashbaum RF; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):352-61. PubMed ID: 12902951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis.
    Kim DH; Ryu KS; Kim MK; Park CK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Aug; 7(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 17688051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.