These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189463)
21. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Segmental translation after lumbar total disc replacement using Prodisc-L®: associated factors and relation to facet arthrosis. Shin MH; Ryu KS; Rathi NK; Park CK J Neurosurg Sci; 2017 Feb; 61(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25649063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Mathew P; Blackman M; Redla S; Hussein AA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):E311-4. PubMed ID: 15928541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Fenk-Mayer A; Eerulkar J; Emerson JW J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16506474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intervertebral disc height correlates with vertebral body T-scores in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Baron YM; Brincat MP; Calleja-Agius J; Calleja N Menopause Int; 2009 Jun; 15(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 19465670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Marnay T J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):490-6. PubMed ID: 15741612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable? Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique. Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):651-6, vii. PubMed ID: 16326288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up. Park CK; Ryu KS; Jee WH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1755-61. PubMed ID: 18580548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Risk factors of non-surgical vertebral fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty of single segment thoracolumbar fracture]. Wu J; Guan YH; Fan SL Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Sep; 30(9):833-837. PubMed ID: 29455485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. Lim MR; Girardi FP; Zhang K; Huang RC; Peterson MG; Cammisa FP J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Jun; 18(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 15905770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of patients who have undergone 1-Level versus 2-Level ProDisc arthroplasty: a prospective study with minimum of 5-year follow-up. Yue J; Zhang K; Bai HX; Du J; Cammisa F; Abjornson C; Mo F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1194-8. PubMed ID: 23392415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Shim CS; Lee SH; Shin HD; Kang HS; Choi WC; Jung B; Choi G; Ahn Y; Lee S; Lee HY Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1012-8. PubMed ID: 17450077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion. Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute. Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]