These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189489)

  • 1. Measured visual field extent varies with peripheral stimulus flicker rate in very young children.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 82(9):800-6. PubMed ID: 16189489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of flicker rate on measured visual field extent in very young children.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):846-52. PubMed ID: 11763259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of flicker rate on nasal and temporal measured visual field extent in infants.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):922-8. PubMed ID: 15592116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of a central stimulus on visual field measurements in children from 3.5 to 30 months of age.
    Harvey EM; Dobson V; Narter DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Sep; 74(9):768-74. PubMed ID: 9380375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus motion increases measured visual field extent in children 3.5 to 30 months of age.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Mohan KM; Weidenbacher HJ; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 77(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 10701806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does rate of stimulus presentation affect measured visual field extent in infants and toddlers?
    Mohan KM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Delaney SM; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 10333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.
    Dobson V; Baldwin MB; Mohan KM; Delaney SM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Oct; 80(10):698-702. PubMed ID: 14560120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flicker perimetry in diabetic children without retinopathy.
    Lobefalo L; Verrotti A; Mastropasqua L; Chiarelli F; Morgese G; Gallenga PE
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1997 Aug; 32(5):324-8. PubMed ID: 9276120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flicker perimetry using a luminance threshold strategy at frequencies from 5-25 Hz in glaucoma, ocular hypertension and normal controls.
    Austin MW; O'Brien CJ; Wishart PK
    Curr Eye Res; 1994 Oct; 13(10):717-23. PubMed ID: 7842720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation to peripheral flicker.
    Anstis S
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3479-85. PubMed ID: 8977014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flicker-defined form stimuli are minimally affected by centre-surround lateral contrast interactions.
    Denniss J; McKendrick AM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 26743018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of stimulus duration in flicker perimetry.
    Anderson AJ; Vingrys AJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 28(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 10981805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kojetinsky S; Ostermaier N; Angstwurm K; Vivell PM; Schaumberger M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grating and flicker sensitivity in the near and far periphery: naso-temporal asymmetries and binocular summation.
    Grigsby SS; Tsou BH
    Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2841-8. PubMed ID: 7975319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of dynamic processing in the visual field of patients with age-related maculopathy.
    Eisenbarth W; Mackeben M; Poggel DA; Strasburger H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 246(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 17882447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of luminance and external temporal noise on flicker sensitivity as a function of stimulus size at various eccentricities.
    Mäkelä P; Rovamo J; Whitaker D
    Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(15):1981-91. PubMed ID: 7941398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of hypercapnia on the sensitivity to flicker defined stimuli.
    Shahidi AM; Hudson C; Patel SR; Flanagan JG
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 99(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 25232025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
    Yoshiyama KK; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Oct; 38(11):2270-7. PubMed ID: 9344350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals.
    Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3096-102. PubMed ID: 8407217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship of visual threshold and reaction time to visual field eccentricity with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 11888543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.