These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189901)

  • 1. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
    Ouellette AR
    Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
    Hunt WE
    Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
    Caffera SM
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
    O'Brien EJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
    Davidson SI
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
    Meilaender G
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
    Brindisi TJ
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Until life support do us part: a spouse's limited ability to terminate life support for an incompetent spouse with no hope of recovery.
    Herald M
    Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 24(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 15164748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
    Calder M
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
    Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
    S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A time to live, a time to die.
    Stiefel LS
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical issues at the end of life.
    Young EW
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.