These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189903)
1. Freezing the heir apparent: a dialogue on postmortem conception, parental responsibility, and inheritance. Chester R Houst Law Rev; 1996; 33(4):967-1025. PubMed ID: 16189903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The real sexual revolution: posthumously conceived children. Sutton S St Johns Law Rev; 1999; 73(3):857-931. PubMed ID: 12449929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent? VanCannon K Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Posthumous reproduction. Kindregan CP; McBrien M Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):579-97. PubMed ID: 16610148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatherhood after death: a legal and ethical analysis of posthumous reproduction. Corvalan A Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1997; 7():E1-E26. PubMed ID: 16518900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A look at the rights and entitlements of posthumously conceived children: no surefire way to tame the reproductive Wild West. Scott MW Emory Law J; 2003; 52(2):963-96. PubMed ID: 15295835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Life after death: preservation of the immortal seed. Berry JJ Tulane Law Rev; 1997 Nov; 72(1):231-56. PubMed ID: 16086486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Not without my father: the legal status of the posthumously conceived child. Scharman CA Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 55(3):1001-54. PubMed ID: 15164750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New reproductive technologies and the inheritance rights of unborn children. Hoffman S; Morriss AP J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):721-4. PubMed ID: 14968674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproduction: children conceived posthumously entitled to inheritance rights. Kirk CE J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 11905256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Postmortem parenthood and the need for a protocol with posthumous sperm procurement. Batzer FR; Hurwitz JM; Caplan A Fertil Steril; 2003 Jun; 79(6):1263-9. PubMed ID: 12798869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The momentum of posthumous conception: a model act. O'Brien RC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 25(2):332-85. PubMed ID: 19537563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Estate of Kolacy. United States. Superior Court Wests Atl Report; 2000; 753():1257-64. PubMed ID: 16477732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posthumous insemination and consent: the continuing, troubling case of Mr and Mrs Blood. McLachlan HV; Swales JK Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 14964205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Traditional concepts and nontraditional conceptions: social security survivor's benefits for posthumously conceived children. Banks GJ Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 32(2):251-379. PubMed ID: 12455504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hecht v. Superior Court: recognizing a property right in reproductive material. Collins JL Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Summer; 33(3):661-84. PubMed ID: 11660116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology. Katz GA Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]