289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16189909)
1. Respecting human life in 21st century America: a moral perspective to extend civil rights to the unborn from creation to natural death.
Lugosi CI
St Louis Univ Law J; 2004; 48(2):425-74. PubMed ID: 16189909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Respecting human life in 21st century America: a moral perspective to extend civil rights to the unborn from creation to natural death.
Lugosi CI
Issues Law Med; 2005; 20(3):211-58. PubMed ID: 15916258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human cloning and the Constitution.
Forsythe CD
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):469-542. PubMed ID: 12710444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Created equal: how the Declaration of Independence recognizes and guarantees the right to life for the unborn.
Trapp M
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2001; 28(4):819-47. PubMed ID: 16528851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe and the new frontier.
Roy LS
Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: round 1.
Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The present standing of the human embryo in U.S. law.
Avila D
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):203-26. PubMed ID: 12854540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade.
Rice CF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Life's Dominion: a review essay.
Bradley GV
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1993; 69(2):329-91. PubMed ID: 11656437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lethal experimentation on human beings: Roe's effect on bioethics.
Saunders WL
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):817-30. PubMed ID: 16700125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dorczak A
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
Gelinas A
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
