175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16190234)
1. Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis.
Cohan DS; Hakami A; Hu Y; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6739-48. PubMed ID: 16190234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between VOC and NOx emissions and chemical production of tropospheric ozone in the Aburrá Valley (Colombia).
Toro MV; Cremades LV; Calbó J
Chemosphere; 2006 Oct; 65(5):881-8. PubMed ID: 16631888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling the effects of VOC/NOx emissions on ozone synthesis in the cascadia airshed of the Pacific Northwest.
Barna M; Lamb B; Westberg H
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Jul; 51(7):1021-34. PubMed ID: 15658221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling and direct sensitivity analysis of biogenic emissions impacts on regional ozone formation in the Mexico-U.S. border area.
Mendoza-Dominguez A; Wilkinson JG; Yang YJ; Russell AG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Jan; 50(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 10680362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Control of ozone precursors in a complex industrial terrain by using multiscale-nested air quality models with fine spatial resolution (1 km2).
Jiménez P; Parra R; Baldasano JM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Aug; 55(8):1085-99. PubMed ID: 16187579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model.
Dunker AM; Yarwood G; Ortmann JP; Wilson GM
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jul; 36(13):2953-64. PubMed ID: 12144273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allocating anthropogenic pollutant emissions over space: application to ozone pollution management.
Diem JE; Comrie AC
J Environ Manage; 2001 Dec; 63(4):425-47. PubMed ID: 11826724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of population density and temporal variations in emissions on the air duality benefits of NOx emission trading.
Nobel CE; McDonald-Buller EC; Kimura Y; Lumbley KE; Allen DT
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(16):3465-73. PubMed ID: 12214636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the effect of weekday-weekend differences in motor vehicle emissions on photochemical air pollution in central California.
Marr LC; Harley RA
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(19):4099-106. PubMed ID: 12380081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of ozone-nitrogen oxides-volatile organic compound sensitivity of Cincinnati, Ohio.
Torres-Jardón R; Keener TC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):322-33. PubMed ID: 16573195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propagation of uncertainty in hourly utility NOx emissions through a photochemical grid air quality model: a case study for the Charlotte, NC, modeling domain.
Abdel-Aziz AM; Frey HC
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Apr; 38(7):2153-60. PubMed ID: 15112819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Projected ozone trends and changes in the ozone-precursor relationship in the South Coast Air Basin in response to varying reductions of precursor emissions.
Fujita EM; Campbell DE; Stockwell WR; Saunders E; Fitzgerald R; Perea R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 26514212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atmospheric chlorine chemistry in southeast Texas: impacts on ozone formation and control.
Chang S; Allen DT
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):251-62. PubMed ID: 16433359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A combined approach for the evaluation of a volatile organic compound emissions inventory.
Choi YJ; Calabrese RV; Ehrman SH; Dickerson RR; Stehr JW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Feb; 56(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 16568800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences between weekday and weekend air pollutant levels in southern California.
Blanchard CL; Tanenbaum SJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jul; 53(7):816-28. PubMed ID: 12880070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using air quality modeling to study source-receptor relationships between nitrogen oxides emissions and ozone exposures over the United States.
Tong DQ; Muller NZ; Kan H; Mendelsohn RO
Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1109-17. PubMed ID: 19656569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photochemical modeling in California with two chemical mechanisms: model intercomparison and response to emission reductions.
Cai C; Kelly JT; Avise JC; Kaduwela AP; Stockwell WR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):559-72. PubMed ID: 21608496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precursor reductions and ground-level ozone in the Continental United States.
Hidy GM; Blanchard CL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Oct; 65(10):1261-82. PubMed ID: 26252366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis of ground-level ozone concentration to emission changes in two urban regions of southeast Texas.
Lin CJ; Ho TC; Chu HW; Yang H; Chandru S; Krishnarajanagar N; Chiou P; Hopper JR
J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 15854725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
