184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16190237)
1. Some insights into the gas chromatographic determination of reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) in air.
Kim KH
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6765-9. PubMed ID: 16190237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of low concentration reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) in air: storage issues and measurement by gas chromatography with sulfur chemiluminescence detection.
Khan MA; Whelan ME; Rhew RC
Talanta; 2012 Jan; 88():581-6. PubMed ID: 22265544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Wine Matrix Composition on the Quantification of Volatile Sulfur Compounds by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Pulsed Flame Photometric Detection.
Davis PM; Qian MC
Molecules; 2019 Sep; 24(18):. PubMed ID: 31547318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous measurement of volatile sulfur compounds using ascorbic acid for oxidant removal and gas chromatography-flame photometric detection.
Inomata Y; Matsunaga K; Murai Y; Osada K; Iwasaka Y
J Chromatogr A; 1999 Dec; 864(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 10630876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of sorptive loss patterns for reduced sulfur compounds in the use of the bag sampling method.
Kim KH
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Dec; 123(1-3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16779574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insights into the adsorption capacity and breakthrough properties of a synthetic zeolite against a mixture of various sulfur species at low ppb levels.
Vellingiri K; Kim KH; Kwon EE; Deep A; Jo SH; Szulejko JE
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():484-92. PubMed ID: 26562781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term distributions of reduced sulfur compounds in the ambient air surrounding a large landfill facility.
Kim KH; Choi YJ; Oh SI; Sa JH; Jeon EC; Koo YS
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16738778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of trace volatile sulfur compounds in milk by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection.
Vazquez-Landaverde PA; Torres JA; Qian MC
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):2919-27. PubMed ID: 16840607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An efficient method for measuring dissolved VOSCs in wastewater using GC-SCD with static headspace technique.
Sun J; Hu S; Sharma KR; Keller-Lehmann B; Yuan Z
Water Res; 2014 Apr; 52():208-17. PubMed ID: 24268056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The averaging effect of odorant mixing as determined by air dilution sensory tests: a case study on reduced sulfur compounds.
Kim KH
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(2):1405-17. PubMed ID: 22319360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of volatile sulfur compound concentrations measured with a sulfide detector vs. gas chromatography.
Furne J; Majerus G; Lenton P; Springfield J; Levitt DG; Levitt MD
J Dent Res; 2002 Feb; 81(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 11827259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of methods for the determination of reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) in air.
Pandey SK; Kim KH
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(9):3020-9. PubMed ID: 19534108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of reduced sulfur compounds in air samples for the monitoring of malodor caused by landfills.
Borrás E; Tortajada-Genaro LA; Muñoz A
Talanta; 2016 Feb; 148():472-7. PubMed ID: 26653474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The method for on-site determination of trace concentrations of methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulfide in air using a mobile mass spectrometer with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, combined with a fast enrichment/separation system.
Kudryavtsev AS; Makas AL; Troshkov ML; Grachev MА; Pod'yachev SP
Talanta; 2014 Jun; 123():140-5. PubMed ID: 24725876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection.
Catalan LJ; Liang V; Jia CQ
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Dec; 1136(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 17069822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field instrument for simultaneous large dynamic range measurement of atmospheric hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol, and sulfur dioxide.
Toda K; Ohira S; Tanaka T; Nishimura T; Dasgupta PK
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1529-36. PubMed ID: 15046356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method to test the detectability of GC/PFPD for an extended concentration range with respect to reduced sulfur compounds.
Kim KH
J Sep Sci; 2008 Jun; 31(10):1761-8. PubMed ID: 18481327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fundamental properties of the direct injection method in the analysis of gaseous reduced sulfur by gas chromatography with a pulsed flame photometric detector.
Pandey SK; Kim KH
Anal Chim Acta; 2008 May; 615(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 18442522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitive quantification of sulfur compounds in wine by headspace solid-phase microextraction technique.
Fang Y; Qian MC
J Chromatogr A; 2005 Jul; 1080(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 16008056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative determination of wine highly volatile sulfur compounds by using automated headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-pulsed flame photometric detection. Critical study and optimization of a new procedure.
López R; Lapeña AC; Cacho J; Ferreira V
J Chromatogr A; 2007 Mar; 1143(1-2):8-15. PubMed ID: 17207804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
