These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16190826)

  • 1. Shockwave lithotripsy: instrumentation and status in China.
    Sun XZ; Zhang ZW
    J Endourol; 2005 Sep; 19(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 16190826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of efficacy of German and Chinese electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters: Dornier Compact S vs Huikang MZ-SWL-V.
    Shen L; Sun X; Cong X; Wang Y; Zhu H; He L
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1240-3. PubMed ID: 21777956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ SWL of ureteral stones: comparison between an electrohydraulic and an electromagnetic shockwave source.
    Tailly GG
    J Endourol; 2002 May; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 12042101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-center experience using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi.
    Ng CF; Thompson TJ; McLornan L; Tolley DA
    J Endourol; 2006 Jan; 20(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 16426122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones.
    Sun XZ; Zhang ZW
    Asian J Surg; 2006 Jan; 29(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 16428097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consecutive experience with four Dornier lithotripters: HM4, MPL 9000, compact, and U/50.
    Tailly GG
    J Endourol; 1999 Jun; 13(5):329-38. PubMed ID: 10446791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Piezoelectric, electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stone].
    Sun X; Chen C; Wang Y; Yu H
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 37(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 11829829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
    Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of mobile lithotripters at one institution: healthtronics lithotron, Dornier MFL-5000, and Dornier Doli.
    Fuselier HA; Prats L; Fontenot C; Gauthier A
    J Endourol; 1999 Oct; 13(8):539-42. PubMed ID: 10597121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Mohanty NK; Jain M; Prakash S; Arora RP
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 20973739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience with EDAP LT02 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in 1363 patients: comparison with results of LT01 SWL in 1586 patients.
    Kim SC; Moon YT
    J Endourol; 1997 Apr; 11(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9107582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extracorporeal piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: are second-generation lithotripters obsolete?
    Virgili G; Mearini E; Micali S; Miano R; Vespasiani G; Porena M
    J Endourol; 1999 Oct; 13(8):543-7. PubMed ID: 10597122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic efficacy of Dornier MPL 9000 for prevesical calculi as judged by efficiency quotient.
    Ather MH; Memon A
    J Endourol; 2000 Sep; 14(7):551-3. PubMed ID: 11030534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20-mm single upper urinary tract calculi.
    Jamshaid A; Ather MH; Hussain G; Khawaja KB
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 18822451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?
    Tiselius HG
    J Endourol; 2008 Feb; 22(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 18294029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
    Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anesthesia for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Teikyo University Hospital experience using the third generation lithotripter.
    Kurihara K; Kamiyama Y; Saito K; Yasuda M; Ide H; Muto S; Okada H; Horie S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2007 Aug; 53(8):545-9. PubMed ID: 17874545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.
    Chang TH; Lin WR; Tsai WK; Chiang PK; Chen M; Tseng JS; Chiu AW
    BMC Urol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 33172476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shockwave Lithotripsy Complications According to Modified Clavien-Dindo Grading System. A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis in a Sample of 115 Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Tzelves L; Geraghty R; Mourmouris P; Chatzikrachtis N; Karavitakis M; Somani B; Skolarikos A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1452-1460. PubMed ID: 34848163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.