These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619114)

  • 1. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Vandali AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3367-71. PubMed ID: 1619114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP).
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 1993 Oct; 14(5):350-67. PubMed ID: 8224578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) processor.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Vandali AE; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Sep; 112(5):752-61. PubMed ID: 1456029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy.
    McKay CM; Vandali AE; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Jan; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 8128854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emphasis of short-duration acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users.
    Vandali AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2049-61. PubMed ID: 11386557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of speech processor fitting strategies for Chinese-speaking cochlear implantees.
    Sun JC; Skinner MW; Liu SY; Wang FN; Huang TS; Lin T
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):560-8. PubMed ID: 9546270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness ratio production by cochlear implantees using the spectral maxima sound processor.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 8738632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Battmer RD; Döring WH; Müller-Deile J
    Audiology; 1995; 34(3):145-59. PubMed ID: 8561692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of upgrading to the Nucleus
    Todorov MJ; Galvin KL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 29566583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.
    Fishman KE; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1201-15. PubMed ID: 9328890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Dowell RC; Seligman PM; Brimacombe JA; Beiter AL
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 2026285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects.
    Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):861-73. PubMed ID: 9972571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Demorest ME; Fourakis MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3766-82. PubMed ID: 9193063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cochlear implants].
    Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD; Nakahodo K; Laszig R
    HNO; 1986 Jul; 34(7):271-9. PubMed ID: 3755709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital speech processing for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 1475099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.