These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619114)

  • 21. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth.
    Faulkner A; Rosen S; Stanton D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1073-80. PubMed ID: 12597200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Eddington DK; Rabinowitz WM
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx-Spano C; Sigrist A; François J; Tinembart J; Degive C; Montandon P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1995 Sep; 115(5):622-8. PubMed ID: 8928633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
    Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The multi-channel cochlear implant and the relief of severe-to-profound deafness.
    Clark G
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 May; 13(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 22334029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of different choices of n in an n of m processor for cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Parkinson A; Wilson B; Parkinson W; Lowder M; Witt S; Rubinstein J; Gantz B
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():311-5. PubMed ID: 11892176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coding of voice source information in the Nucleus cochlear implant system.
    Jones PA; McDermott HJ; Seligman PM; Millar JB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():363-5. PubMed ID: 7668708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.
    Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mechanism of speech perception in patients with a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Sakakihara J
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1994 Aug; 19(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 7994894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Zerbi M; Finley CC; Wolford RD
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 8588675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 116(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of loudness models to sound processing for cochlear implants.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Richardson LM; Henshall KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2190-7. PubMed ID: 14587616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.