These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619114)

  • 41. Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance.
    Skinner MW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2003 Sep; 191():4-13. PubMed ID: 14533838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Variables affecting implant performance in children.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Stroer BS; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Carney AE
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8072359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 3624639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Converted and upgraded maps programmed in the newer speech processor for the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant.
    Magalhães AT; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino AC; Tsuji RK; Bento RF; Brito R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1193-200. PubMed ID: 23921918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
    Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of test-retest measures to evaluate performance stability in adults with cochlear implants.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Demorest ME; Holden TA
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 7789670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users.
    Svirsky MA; Lane H; Perkell JS; Wozniak J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1284-300. PubMed ID: 1401516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reimplantation of a molded scala tympani electrode: impact on psychophysical and speech discrimination abilities.
    Hochmair-Desoyer I; Burian K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(1 Pt 1):65-70. PubMed ID: 3838227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers.
    Cafarelli Dees D; George C; Stevenson F; Sheridan C; Haacke NP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():258-60. PubMed ID: 7668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of loudness imbalance between electrodes in cochlear implant users.
    Dawson PW; Skok M; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 9099565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Study on the effect of the number of electrodes programmed and the area of stimulation in cochlear implant patients.
    Naito A; Kitano Y; Iida M; Ishida K; Sakai M; Koga K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():412-6. PubMed ID: 11892204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Ash KR; Shallop JK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Perception and confusion of speech sounds by adults with a cochlear implant.
    Rødvik AK
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):371-8. PubMed ID: 18415737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Cruz RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):169-84. PubMed ID: 15724088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.