These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619131)

  • 1. The role of interaural time difference and fundamental frequency difference in the identification of concurrent vowel pairs.
    Shackleton TM; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3579-81. PubMed ID: 1619131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli.
    Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1927-32. PubMed ID: 1960286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold differences for interaural time delays carried by double vowels.
    Akeroyd MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2167-77. PubMed ID: 14587614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs.
    Tallus J; Hugdahl K; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():195-200. PubMed ID: 17920571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1749-56. PubMed ID: 2262631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory backward recognition masking: effect of interaural phase on masker efficacy.
    Shilling RD; Soderquist DR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 2345685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1709-19. PubMed ID: 2341675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli.
    Culling JF; Lewis HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20968362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration.
    Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A central spectrum theory of binaural processing. Evidence from dichotic pitch.
    Raatgever J; Bilsen FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):429-41. PubMed ID: 3745675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fringed correlation discrimination and binaural detection.
    Jain M; Gallagher DT; Koehnke J; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1918-26. PubMed ID: 1960285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek.
    Lengeris A; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
    Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.
    Albeck Y; Nebenzahl I; Lewis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component.
    Darwin CJ; Ciocca V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3381-90. PubMed ID: 1619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fringe effects in modulation masking.
    Bacon SP; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 1619121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain lesions, central masking, and dichotic speech perception.
    Harris J
    Brain Lang; 1994 Jan; 46(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 8131046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.
    Warren RM
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 6385048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.