These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16191613)

  • 1. Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution.
    Stewart AD; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 272(1576):2029-35. PubMed ID: 16191613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Rice WR; Stewart AD; Morrow EH; Linder JE; Orteiza N; Byrne PG
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):287-99. PubMed ID: 16612888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual conflict is not counterbalanced by good genes in the laboratory Drosophila melanogaster model system.
    Stewart AD; Hannes AM; Mirzatuny A; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1808-13. PubMed ID: 18681915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct benefits of choosing a high-fitness mate can offset the indirect costs associated with intralocus sexual conflict.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1710-1718. PubMed ID: 28369895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?
    Long TA; Montgomerie R; Chippindale AK
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):363-74. PubMed ID: 16612894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict.
    Lew TA; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pitnick S; García-González F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Sep; 269(1502):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12350270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale A
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1115-22. PubMed ID: 16033585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
    Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Costs and benefits of giant sperm and sperm storage organs in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Zajitschek S; Zajitschek F; Josway S; Al Shabeeb R; Weiner H; Manier MK
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1300-1309. PubMed ID: 31465604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Reinhart M; Carney T; Clark AG; Fiumera AC
    J Hered; 2015; 106(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 25425680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: are indirect benefits condition dependent?
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2010 Sep; 64(9):2767-74. PubMed ID: 20394654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Brown WD; Bjork A; Schneider K; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1242-50. PubMed ID: 15266973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The timing of mating influences reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for sexual conflict.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Nichols RV; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2010 May; 23(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20345814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale AK
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Nov; 4(11):e356. PubMed ID: 17105343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.