These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16191824)

  • 41. Not all nonwords are alike: implications for reading development and theory.
    Treiman R; Goswami U; Bruck M
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 2266857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Phonological Preparation in Korean: Phoneme, or Syllable or Another Unit?
    Li C; Wang M; Kim SY; Bolger DJ; Wright K
    Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):337-353. PubMed ID: 34044663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall.
    Lange EB; Oberauer K
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):333-9. PubMed ID: 15948618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reversing the phonological similarity effect.
    Nairne JS; Kelley MR
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 10087855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The syllabic status of final consonants in early speech: a case study.
    Yuen I; Miles K; Cox F; Demuth K
    J Child Lang; 2015 May; 42(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 25068836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables.
    Treiman R; Danis C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jan; 14(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 2963893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?
    Schubert T; Kinoshita S; Norris D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):642-656. PubMed ID: 28093020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.
    Onishi KH; Chambers KE; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):B13-23. PubMed ID: 11814489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Using Network Science and Psycholinguistic Megastudies to Examine the Dimensions of Phonological Similarity.
    Castro N; Vitevitch MS
    Lang Speech; 2023 Mar; 66(1):143-174. PubMed ID: 35586894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of phonemic processing on the retention of graphemic representations for words and nonwords.
    Hock HS; Throckmorton B; Webb E; Rosenthal A
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Sep; 9(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 7321864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The nature of phoneme representation in spoken word recognition.
    Gaskell MG; Quinlan PT; Tamminen J; Cleland AA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):282-302. PubMed ID: 18473660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Choosing between alternative spellings of sounds: The role of context.
    Treiman R; Kessler B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1154-9. PubMed ID: 26689618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How African American English-Speaking First Graders Segment and Rhyme Words and Nonwords With Final Consonant Clusters.
    Shollenbarger AJ; Robinson GC; Taran V; Choi SE
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2017 Oct; 48(4):273-285. PubMed ID: 28973102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?
    Roodenrys S; Hinton M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11827085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Lexical access of resyllabified words: evidence from phoneme monitoring.
    Vroomen J; de Gelder B
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 10355232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Paying the meter: Effect of metrical similarity on word lengthening.
    Myers BR; Watson DG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 31290009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.
    Gupta P; Lipinski J; Aktunc E
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1001-16. PubMed ID: 16496721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?
    Karlsen PJ; Imenes AG; Johannessen K; Endestad T; Lian A
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):448-57. PubMed ID: 16416144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exploring word recognition in a semi-alphabetic script: the case of Devanagari.
    Vaid J; Gupta A
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):679-90. PubMed ID: 12081431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.