293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192139)
1. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street.
Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.
McGuire AL; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability in human subject research: existential state, not category designation.
Finder SG
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):68-70; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
McGregor J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 16179302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.
Dickert N; Grady C
N Engl J Med; 1999 Jul; 341(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 10403861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting.
Justo L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vulnerability: a needed moral safeguard.
DeMarco JP
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):82-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflict of interest in human subjects research.
Groeger JS; Barnes M
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S137-42. PubMed ID: 12626959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Enrolling the uninsured in clinical trials: an ethical perspective.
Pace C; Miller FG; Danis M
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S121-5. PubMed ID: 12626956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revisiting the Ethics of Research on Human Subjects.
Tsay C
AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1105-7. PubMed ID: 27086370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.
Sachs B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Undue inducements and reasonable risks: will the dismal science lead to dismal research ethics?
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 16179305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contextualizing the vulnerability standard.
Shivas T
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):84-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
