These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192141)
1. Vulnerable subjects and civic professionalism: would six-sigma research and research ethics consultation solve the vulnerability problem? Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):54-5; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects. Kopelman LM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The physician's role, "sham surgery," and trust: a conflict of duties? Clark CC Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):57-8. PubMed ID: 14744337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human subjects research with prisoners: putting the ethical question in context. Obasogie OK; Reiter KA Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 21158873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Coercion and the SATURN study. Resnik DB Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A modest proposal. Burris S; Davis C Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):W3-4. PubMed ID: 19882443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unnecessary holes in the head. Gillett GR IRB; 2001; 23(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12737174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adding insult to injury: reluctance to engage in clinical research with at-risk groups further disenfranchises these populations. Lynch HF; Dawson L Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):62-4. PubMed ID: 19882465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The need to explicate the ethical evaluation tools to avoid ethical inflation. Bernabe RD; van Thiel GJ; Raaijmakers JA; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 19882462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and direction in research ethics: a question of direction. Clark CC Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):78-80; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating empirical assessments of social risk. Schonfeld T; Brown JS Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 19882461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Miller FG; Brody H Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trials in vulnerable populations. Cook D; Moore-Cox A; Xavier D; Lauzier F; Roberts I Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18283082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical analysis of translational research is more complex than distinguishing T1 from T2. Allen B Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):33-5. PubMed ID: 20694903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the appropriateness of including children in clinical research: how thick is the ice? Sugarman J JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(4):494-6. PubMed ID: 14747509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Translational research beyond approval: a two-stage ethics review. Sofaer N; Eyal N Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20694895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation? Elliott C Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 26659598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Vulnerability in research ethics: a way forward. Lange MM; Rogers W; Dodds S Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 23718774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]