These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192143)
1. "Vulnerability" in context: recognizing the sociopolitical influences. Campbell AT Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):58-9; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J; Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street. Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability: a needed moral safeguard. DeMarco JP Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):82-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking beyond the limitations of "vulnerability": reforming safeguards in research. DeBruin DA Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):76-8; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics. McGuire AL; McCullough LB Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research subjects in developing nations and vulnerability. Resnik DB Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):63-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Subject vulnerability: the precautionary principle of human research. Grinnell F Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):72-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics. Sharp RR; Yarborough M Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Participatory research: a way to reduce vulnerability. Justo L Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):67-8; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Adolescent decisional autonomy in research: issues in translating research into policy. Campbell AT Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):78-80. PubMed ID: 16179326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice. London AJ Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contextualizing the vulnerability standard. Shivas T Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):84-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Waste not, want not: cognitive impairment should not preclude research participation. Hougham GW Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):36-7; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Some questionable premises about research ethics. Macklin R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Vulnerability in human subject research: existential state, not category designation. Finder SG Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):68-70; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Free-riding and research ethics. Allhoff F Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The natural history of vulnerability. Moreno JD Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):52-3; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research versus innovation: real differences. Morreim H Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]