244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192156)
1. Vulnerability: a needed moral safeguard.
DeMarco JP
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):82-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Vulnerability in human subject research: existential state, not category designation.
Finder SG
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):68-70; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking beyond the limitations of "vulnerability": reforming safeguards in research.
DeBruin DA
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):76-8; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the case for the regulation of research.
Wilkinson T
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):63-5. PubMed ID: 20694915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street.
Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contextualizing the vulnerability standard.
Shivas T
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):84-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is a patient and why does it matter?
Iltis AS
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):62-4. PubMed ID: 21534158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
McGregor J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 16179302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The natural history of vulnerability.
Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):52-3; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.
Kass NE; Faden RR; Goodman SN; Pronovost P; Tunis S; Beauchamp TL
Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; Spec No():S4-S15. PubMed ID: 23315895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Subject vulnerability: the precautionary principle of human research.
Grinnell F
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):72-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Responses to open peer commentaries on "research exceptionalism".
Hunter D; Wilson J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20694896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
