175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192168)
1. Clinical justice guiding medical allocations.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):116-9; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The ethical quality report card: confronting rationing.
Strosberg MA
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):114-5; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: insights from the Harvard Community Health Plan's LORAN Commission Report.
Paris JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):103-4; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Obligations and marginal decisions in a fair health system.
Berger JT
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):123-4; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fairness in context: the real versus the ideal.
Slomka J
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):115-6; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring fairness: an opportunity for empirical ethics.
Light DW
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):105-6; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: appearance or reality?
Baily MA
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):110-2; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supplementing the fairness framework: system-level and implementation concerns.
Majumder MA
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):112-4; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: an application of the Ethical Force Program's recommendations on infertility treatment.
Goldberg MK
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):106-8; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mythic ideals.
Steinberg D
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):122-3; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wanted: more assistance in benefits design.
Gervais KG; Garrett JE
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):119-21; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: performance expectations for quality improvement.
Wynia MK; Cummins D; Fleming D; Karsjens K; Orr A; Sabin J; Saphire-Bernstein I; Witlen R;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):87-100. PubMed ID: 16192158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The elephant in the living room of the house of health care.
Lamm RD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):101-2; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Shifting the focus of rationing discussions.
Stark M
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jul; 11(7):20-2. PubMed ID: 21745076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tragic choices: state discretion over organ transplant funding for Medicaid recipients.
Weigert DL
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 89():268-317. PubMed ID: 16086527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensuring fairness in coverage decisions: applying the American Medical Association Ethical Force Program's consensus report to managed care pharmacy.
Teagarden JR; Wynia MK
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2006 Sep; 63(18):1749-54. PubMed ID: 16960260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating social value: on the intersection of mortality and economics in the distribution of publicly funded medical care.
Klein DA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jul; 11(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 21745075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationing just medical care.
Schneiderman LJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jul; 11(7):7-14. PubMed ID: 21745072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare coverage for technological innovations.
Wynia MK; Witlen R
N Engl J Med; 2004 Aug; 351(7):719-20; author reply 719-20. PubMed ID: 15306678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Particular sorrows, common challenges: specialized infertility treatment and the common good.
Ryan MA
Annu Soc Christ Ethics; 1994; ():187-206. PubMed ID: 15685748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
