144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192194)
1. Morality, justice and opting in.
Koppelman-White ER
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):26-7; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An "opting in" paradigm for organ procurement for kidney transplantation? A community based participatory approach is a different view, and a softer approach.
Sodeke SO
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):48-50; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conscientious objection to an opt-in system.
Hackler C
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):25-6; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Shifting to other justice issues: examining listing practices.
Dudzinski DM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):35-7; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are organs personal property or a societal resource?
Truog RD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 16109683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prudential motives and reciprocal altruism.
Viens AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):44-6; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Haunted by the "God Committee": reciprocity does no justice to eliminating social disparities.
Gordon EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):23-5; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflections on fairness in UNOS allocation policies.
Siegal G; Bonnie RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 16109691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A matter of priority: transplanting organs preferentially to registered donors.
Kolber AJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 2003; 55(3):671-740. PubMed ID: 16189910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Values, policies, and the public trust.
Fox MD; Allee MR
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 16109678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. UNOS: the faithless trustee.
Cohen LR
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):13-4. PubMed ID: 16109682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Discriminating against "organ takers".
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):31-3; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On the possibility of "progress" in managing biomedical technologies: markets, lotteries, and rational moral standards in organ transplantation.
Shapiro MH
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):13-69. PubMed ID: 15214334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Opting-in" and unnecessary penalties for non kidney donors.
List JM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):39-41; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the potential exploitation of UNOS policies.
Zink S; Wertlieb S; Catalano J; Marwin V
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 16109680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An "opting in" paradigm for kidney transplantation.
Steinberg D
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):4-14. PubMed ID: 16192186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do gifts create moral obligations for recipients?
Simmerling M; Angelos P; Goldberg A; Frader J
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):20-2; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Another kind of end-run: status upgrades.
Morreim EH
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):11-2. PubMed ID: 16109681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Internalized public moral norms and shared sovereignty.
Saghai Y
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jul; 11(7):49-51. PubMed ID: 21745085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to "Special section on children as organ donors" (CQ vol 13, no 2).
Steinberg D
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 16028544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
