These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16192204)
1. Prudential motives and reciprocal altruism. Viens AM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):44-6; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A matter of priority: transplanting organs preferentially to registered donors. Kolber AJ Rutgers Law Rev; 2003; 55(3):671-740. PubMed ID: 16189910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do gifts create moral obligations for recipients? Simmerling M; Angelos P; Goldberg A; Frader J Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):20-2; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An "opting in" paradigm for kidney transplantation. Steinberg D Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):4-14. PubMed ID: 16192186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morality, justice and opting in. Koppelman-White ER Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):26-7; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Framing the organ system: altruism or cooperation? Robertson C Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):46-8; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Between solidarity and self-interest: how fair is the "club model" for organ donation? Biller-Andorno N Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):19-20; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Values, policies, and the public trust. Fox MD; Allee MR Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 16109678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminating against "organ takers". Allhoff F Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):31-3; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are organs personal property or a societal resource? Truog RD Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 16109683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conscientious objection to an opt-in system. Hackler C Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):25-6; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to commentators on "Examining the potential exploitation of UNOS policies". Zink S; Wertlieb S Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W15-6. PubMed ID: 16179290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On the possibility of "progress" in managing biomedical technologies: markets, lotteries, and rational moral standards in organ transplantation. Shapiro MH Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):13-69. PubMed ID: 15214334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Opting for equity. Fox MD; Allee MR; Taylor GJ Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):15-6; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ transplantation: the ethics of consequences. Weringer EJ Linacre Q; 2002 May; 69(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 12731521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Solidarity: an important aspect of the "opting in" paradigm. Jacoby L Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):16-7; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-family directed donation: the perils of policy-making. Spielman BJ Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 16109689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. LifeSharers: an "opting in" paradigm already in operation. Calandrillo SP; Cohen LR; Undis DJ Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):17-8; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Shifting to other justice issues: examining listing practices. Dudzinski DM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):35-7; discussion W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The gift of life and starfish on the beach: the ethics of organ procurement. Kuczewski MG Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):53-6. PubMed ID: 12230862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]