These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1619248)
1. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right. Benshoof J Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case. Cook RJ Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape. Baron CH Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health care policy and abortion: a comparison. Cohen SS Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 2403668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid. Mendelson JE; Domolky S Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning. Mariner WK Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion. Wardle LD Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills? Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rust corrodes: the First Amendment implications of Rust v. Sullivan. Fitzpatrick M Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 45(1):185-227. PubMed ID: 10183813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship. Sugarman J; Powers M JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A chill wind blows: Webster, obstetrics, and the health of women. Chavkin W; Rosenfield A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 163(2):450-2. PubMed ID: 2386130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom. Bayer R Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]