1421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16193003)
21. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
Max MB
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Science and the stiumulus. NIH hopes stimulus isn't a roller-coaster ride.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1179-80. PubMed ID: 19965445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. National Institutes of Health Center Grants. Final rule.
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
Fed Regist; 2003 Dec; 68(240):69619-22. PubMed ID: 14674396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. National Cancer Act: a look back and forward.
Vanchieri C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17341721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Salaries in the balance.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7230):750-1. PubMed ID: 19274776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Tight budget should fund benefits, not more posts.
Wells RD
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6999):503. PubMed ID: 15282580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
Wadman M
Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Senate approves NIH funding amendment to 2009 proposed budget.
Lang L
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1821. PubMed ID: 18474245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
Garrison HH; McGuire KI; Palazzo RE
Physiologist; 2007 Aug; 50(4):129, 131-3. PubMed ID: 17883021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. House approves NIH funding, "de-funds" two NIMH grants.
Physiologist; 2004 Oct; 47(5):382. PubMed ID: 15587608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. NIH funding of the independent investigator.
Boron WF
Physiology (Bethesda); 2006 Oct; 21():300-1. PubMed ID: 16990450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Lawmakers examine the possibility of favoritism in a $40-million NIH contract with Harvard.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(13):A19. PubMed ID: 15287136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Proposed changes to biomedical funding.
Dressler GR
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5752):1279. PubMed ID: 16311319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. NIH funds support more than a researcher's own lab.
Varmus H
Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Mortgaging the future of medical research.
Feldman AM
Clin Transl Sci; 2012 Apr; 5(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 22507113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. War of words deepens divide over biodefence funds.
Marris E
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):813. PubMed ID: 15829930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. No more third time lucky.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Increasing R01 competition concerns researchers.
Vastag B
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Oct; 98(20):1436-8. PubMed ID: 17047187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Universities fear repercussions as NIH tunes conflicts policy.
Check E
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7010):725. PubMed ID: 15483566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
